In a local paper recently, Council Candidate Kenneth Gregson made some statements that required a response. The paper determined that because I had named the candidate any response would be in breach of the Electoral Act as I didn't have the candidate's permission to name him. Whilst that is accurate if one is spruiking a particular candidate for election, my response was hardly doing that! I amended to generic terms in the letter but with no publication success so I've decided to self-publish here in the original format.
Council Candidate Kenneth Gregson made several comments in
the last issue of GOBC news that cannot go unanswered.
The amount of pensioner rates remission is not a decision
that is made by Council. The amount of
the pensioner rates remission is the sole decision of the State
Government. It is a reasonable
assumption that there should be a whole of sector submission put to the State
Government on the matter and LGAT may well be the forum for that to happen. It is a matter that not only affects GSBC
pensioners but the whole local government sector.
The change from AAR to AAV is not a decision that I agreed
with. It was very poorly implemented by
Council with seemingly little regard for the plight of older ratepayers who now
have the good fortune to reside in homes that have a high AAV. The reasons given for the change were flawed
and as such I voted against the decision.
When did Mr Gregson become an expert on planning matters in
relation to the Prosser Plains Raw Water Scheme (named as Tassal pipeline)? The matter was dealt
with by full Council in accordance with qualified advice presented at the
time. The Solis development is still an
active DA. It should be noted that
Tassal is currently meeting all financial obligations (principal and interest
repayments) in accordance with their contract.
Why were previous GSBC’s allowed to operate outside of
the Local Government Act, and by whom? What evidence does the writer have
to support such an allegation? I seriously
doubt the Local Government Division would allow a Council, any Council, to
operate outside of the Act if this is an evidence-based statement.
Again, when did Mr Gregson become a planning expert without the benefit of the qualified advice reports presented to Council at the time? Cambria will be dealt with by Council acting
as a planning authority when/if the necessity arises. Should Mr Gregson be elected to Council, he
can put all his planning expertise to good use!!
(Authorised by Cheryl Arnol 10 Aubin Court Orford)